AI is already in use at 46% of brands for creator content and work processes, and another 29% plan to use it in the next 12 months, according to the IAB’s creator economy survey. Inside influencer teams, creator discovery leads AI adoption at 36.67%, while fraud detection sits at 7.22%, per Influencer Marketing Hub’s benchmark. Audiences are cooling: Only 26% of consumers prefer AI-generated creator content, down from 60% in 2023, Billion Dollar Boy found. The AI influencer marketing statistics below trace where that gap between brands and audiences opens.
Platforms are tightening the rules at the same time. Instagram will limit the reach of profiles that feature an AI-generated person and do not add the AI-generated profile label, and TikTok has labeled over 3 billion videos as AIGC. Spend, virtual influencer earnings, engagement evidence, and fraud data follow.
Key Takeaways
- Fake or bot followers account for 56.5% of all reported fraud and quality issues, yet fraud detection is the AI use case for only 7.22% of respondents.
- A Journal of Interactive Advertising study of 99,680 Instagram posts from 424 human and virtual influencers found that human influencers elicited greater engagement than virtual influencers.
- 79% of marketers are increasing investment in AI-generated creator content, while half of U.S. consumers (50%) say they would prefer to give their business to brands that do not use GenAI.
- Lu of Magalu posted 74 sponsored posts over the past 12 months, earning an estimated $2,539,680, and her total earnings are 34 times as high as the second-highest earner, Lil Miquela ($73,920).
- 95% of brands have concerns about using AI for creator marketing, and their top concern is lack of authenticity or human connection.
- U.S. creator ad spend more than doubled from $13.9 billion in 2021 to $29.5 billion in 2024.
Editor’s Choice
- Influencer marketing market size: an estimated $32.55 billion in 2025, compared to $24 billion in 2024.
- U.S. creator ad spend: projected to reach $37.1 billion in 2025, with $43.9 billion estimated for 2026.
- Biggest virtual influencer on TikTok: Nobody Sausage, with 22.1 million followers.
- Consumers confident spotting AI creator content: only 45%.
- Creators open to building a digital twin: 85%.
AI Influencer Marketing Statistics by Use Case
- Creator discovery leads AI adoption at 36.67%, the top row of the table.
- Content generation is cited by 21.11% of respondents, and brief development by 13.89%.
- Combined with discovery, these early-stage and creative applications make up 71.67% of selections.
- The 2026 benchmark draws on 600+ respondents, all marketing professionals.
- 66.4% reported that AI had somewhat or significantly improved their results, while only 6.1% experienced any worsening, in a separate Influencer Marketing Hub experts report surveying influencer marketers.
| AI application in influencer marketing | Share of respondents (%) |
|---|---|
| Creator discovery | 36.67 |
| Content generation | 21.11 |
| Brief development | 13.89 |
| Reporting | 10.56 |
| Not using AI | 10.56 |
| Fraud detection | 7.22 |
Source: Influencer Marketing Hub Benchmark Report 2026
About This Data
- Sources: 15, including 6 industry surveys and reports, 3 academic and research-institute studies, 2 government bodies, 2 platform announcements and 2 news reports.
- Publication window: 2024 to 2026-08.
- Selection: survey-based, company-published, regulator and peer-reviewed figures only; aggregator and market-research-seller estimates are excluded.
- Updates: reviewed on a rolling basis and updated when sources publish new editions.
Brand Adoption of AI in Creator Campaigns
- 46% of brands currently use AI for creator content creation and work processes, the largest slice in the chart below.
- 29% plan to use AI in the next 12 months.
- 17% are not using AI but are interested, and 8% are not using it and not planning to.
- Finance and health and wellness brands are slower to adopt AI as they operate in trust- and compliance-intensive environments.
- 48% of brands consider creators a must-buy channel, behind social media at 74% and paid search at 60%.
- The survey base is 453 total respondents.
View the data
Recent Developments
- August 31, 2026: Instagram renamed its AI creator label to AI-generated profile and said it will limit the reach of profiles that feature an AI-generated person and do not add this label.
- August 2, 2026: The AI Act’s Article 50 transparency obligations for providers and deployers of generative AI systems became applicable from 2 August 2026 across the EU.
- July 2026: By the end of July 2026, about 190 companies and organizations had signed the code of practice on transparency of AI-generated content.
- July 10, 2026: TikTok said it has labeled over 3 billion videos as AIGC and is joining the C2PA Steering Committee.
- July 10, 2026: TikTok said it will be testing improvements to its detection systems for accounts dedicated to posting AI-generated spam on politics and current events, financial advice, and medical content.
AI Tasks Brands Run in Creator Campaigns
- Nearly half of marketers use AI to edit and personalize content, while a third use it to generate synthetic content, per the IAB.
- With the top tasks centering on content refinement and work efficiency, full creative replacement has yet to become mainstream.
The task mix matches what we track in AI in marketing statistics: Teams hand AI the production work first.
Influencer Marketing Market Size and Creator Ad Spend
- The influencer marketing industry’s estimated market size reached $32.55 billion in 2025, compared to $24 billion in 2024 and a modest $1.4 billion in 2014.
- That represents a compound annual growth rate of 33.11%.
- For 2025, U.S. creator ad spend is projected to grow another 26% year over year to $37.1 billion, about 4x faster than the media industry overall at 5.7%, per the IAB.
- Spend is estimated at $43.9 billion in 2026, the last point on the line.
- The spend figure includes direct partnerships brands have with creators, paid amplification of those partnerships, and content adjacencies.
View the data
Our influencer marketing statistics break the same spend down by platform, creator tier, and ROI, where AI is one budget line among many.
Creator Ad Spend by Industry
- In IAB’s U.S. data, Retail and CPG lead because they are among the top spending categories overall, combined with heavy social budgets.
Top-Earning and Most-Followed Virtual Influencers
- Brazilian supermarket mascot Lu of Magalu is the highest-paid virtual influencer, earning an estimated $2,539,680 last year, in Kapwing’s analysis.
- Lu posted 74 sponsored posts over the past 12 months, more than four times as many as any other virtual influencer among the top ten earners.
- Barbie has 3.5 million Instagram followers and earns an estimated $15,400 per sponsored post.
- The biggest AI influencer on TikTok is Nobody Sausage, with 22.1 million followers, the highest TikTok bar.
- On TikTok, Janky & Guggimon command 11.6 million followers, 56.8% more than Lu of Magalu at 7.4 million.
View the data
Kapwing used the average cost per follower that real-life influencers charge for sponsored posts and multiplied this by each virtual influencer’s follower count to calculate an estimated charge per sponsored post. Those are modeled rates rather than disclosed contracts, so the earnings below read best as an order of magnitude.
| Virtual influencer | Estimated fee per sponsored post ($) | Estimated Instagram earnings, 12 months ($) |
|---|---|---|
| Lu of Magalu | 34,320 | 2,539,680 |
| Nobody Sausage | 33,880 | n/a |
| Barbie | 15,400 | n/a |
| Lil Miquela | n/a | 73,920 |
Source: Kapwing virtual influencer analysis, July 2025
How much do AI influencers earn?
The highest-paid virtual influencer, Lu of Magalu, earned an estimated $2,539,680, and her total earnings are 34 times as high as the second-highest earner, Lil Miquela ($73,920). The gap comes from posting volume as much as audience size, so a large following alone does not guarantee a large income for a synthetic persona.
Virtual vs Human Influencer Engagement
- Jiemin Looi and Lee Ann Kahlor retrieved 99,680 English-language Instagram posts uploaded by 424 human and virtual influencers within the beauty, fashion, and lifestyle domains from 2020 to 2022.
- A natural experiment found that human influencers elicited greater engagement than virtual influencers.
- Human influencers engaged in active self-promotion, while virtual influencers emphasized their identity.
- Influencer tier also significantly interacted with Instagram verification to affect engagement.
- Instagram posts from both types of influencers predominantly conveyed positive sentiment.
| Study detail | Value |
|---|---|
| Instagram posts analyzed | 99,680 |
| Human and virtual influencers | 424 |
| Collection period | 2020 to 2022 |
| Domains | Beauty, fashion, lifestyle |
| Engagement result | Human influencers elicited greater engagement |
Source: Journal of Interactive Advertising, 2024
Key finding: Virtual influencers may offer advertisers greater creative control and yield greater engagement than human influencers, the claim the Journal of Interactive Advertising study set out to test. The study retrieved 99,680 Instagram posts, and a natural experiment found that human influencers elicited greater engagement than virtual influencers. Engagement promises for virtual personas need a named dataset behind them.
Do virtual influencers get more engagement than human influencers?
Not on the strongest evidence available. A study of posts by 424 human and virtual influencers found that human influencers elicited greater engagement than virtual influencers. The higher virtual-influencer engagement rates that circulate online could not be traced to a primary dataset during this update, so they are left out.
Consumer Trust in AI Influencers and AI-Generated Content
- 76% of consumers trust virtual influencers for product recommendations, in Billion Dollar Boy’s UK and US research.
- Only 45% of consumers feel confident identifying AI-generated creator content, and 57% say digital twins erode trust.
- A Gartner survey of 1,539 U.S. consumers conducted in October 2025 found 50% would prefer to give their business to brands that do not use GenAI.
- 68% frequently wonder whether the content and information they see is real.
- On average, 44% of the participants are aware that AI can create marketing content like ads or social media posts top column.
- Only about 28% understand how personal data is used by AI for personalization of marketing content.
- Most Americans (76%) say it’s extremely or very important to be able to tell if pictures, videos, and text were made by AI or people, but 53% are not too or not at all confident they can detect it, per Pew Research Center.
View the data
NIM’s experiments point the same way: Labeling an ad as AI-generated led to a more critical evaluation, and participants’ willingness to research or purchase the product decreased. Gartner analyst Emily Weiss puts it this way: “Marketers should treat GenAI as a trust decision as much as a technology decision.” The open question is how much of any social feed is now synthetic, which our AI-generated social media content data tries to size.
| Survey | Finding | Share (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Billion Dollar Boy (UK and US) | Trust virtual influencers for product recommendations | 76 |
| Billion Dollar Boy (UK and US) | Say digital twins erode trust | 57 |
| Billion Dollar Boy (UK and US) | Feel confident identifying AI-generated creator content | 45 |
| Billion Dollar Boy (UK and US) | Prefer AI-generated creator content (60% in 2023) | 26 |
| Gartner (US, October 2025) | Frequently wonder whether content is real | 68 |
| Gartner (US, October 2025) | Prefer brands that do not use GenAI | 50 |
| Pew Research Center (US, June 2025) | Say telling AI from human content is extremely or very important | 76 |
| Pew Research Center (US, June 2025) | Not too or not at all confident they can detect AI content | 53 |
Source: Billion Dollar Boy 2026, Gartner 2026, Pew Research Center 2025
AI Priorities for Influencer Programs in 2026
- The top focus area is AI-driven creator matching at 26.89%.
- Social commerce is the second-ranked priority at 19.33%.
- AI-assisted content generation draws 12.04%.
- Combined, the two AI priorities (matching and content generation) account for 38.93% of all selections.
- Creator licensing, whitelisting, and Spark Ads sit at 7.56%, and long-term creator partnerships at 6.44%.
- Improved measurement and attribution and UGC for performance ads each rank low at 4.76%.
| 2026 focus area | Share of respondents (%) |
|---|---|
| AI-driven creator matching | 26.89 |
| Social commerce | 19.33 |
| AI-assisted content generation | 12.04 |
| Creator licensing, whitelisting and Spark Ads | 7.56 |
| Long-term creator partnerships | 6.44 |
| Live shopping | 5.6 |
| New platform growth or shifts | 5.6 |
| Improved measurement and attribution | 4.76 |
| UGC for performance ads | 4.76 |
Source: Influencer Marketing Hub Benchmark Report 2026
Influencer Fraud and the AI Validation Gap
- Fake or bot followers account for 56.5% of all reported fraud and quality issues, the longest bar in the chart below.
- Inauthentic or templated comments represent 10.6% of selections, and fake or purchased engagement represents 10.2%.
- Incentivized or undisclosed reviews account for 6.1%, and misreported performance metrics account for 5.4%.
- Only 10.9% selected none of the above.
- Rising creator costs are the top challenge at 35.4%, and fake engagement and authenticity issues account for 12.73% of selections.
View the data
Why it matters: In the same Influencer Marketing Hub survey, fake or bot followers account for 56.5% of reported fraud and quality issues, while fraud detection sits at 7.22% of AI use. Brands are using AI to find creators faster than they use it to check whether an audience is real, the category that dominates reported problems.
Creator Attitudes Toward AI and Virtual Influencers
- 87% of creators have increased their use of generative AI in the past year.
- 87% of creators say it helps them produce more content.
- 85% of creators are open to creating a digital twin, one of the top bars.
- 62% fear increased competition from virtual influencers.
- 60% of creators admit their AI-assisted content has broken industry rules, often due to mislabeling.
- Around 77% of marketers and creators believe AI is effective at crafting emotionally resonant content, but only 33% of consumers agree AI is currently delivering emotional resonance.
View the data
Creators are scaling output with AI while worrying about synthetic rivals, a tension that runs through our creator economy statistics.
AI Influencer Disclosure Rules and Platform Labels
- Under the FTC’s final rule on fake reviews, reviews and testimonials that misrepresent that they are by someone who does not exist, such as AI-generated fake reviews, are prohibited.
- The Commission vote to approve the final rule was 5-0, and the rule becomes effective 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.
- The rule allows the agency to seek civil penalties against violators and deter AI-generated fake reviews.
- Article 50 obligations, applicable from 2 August 2026, pertain to marking and detection of AI-generated content and labelling of deepfakes and certain AI-generated publications.
- The code’s timeline lists its closing plenary on 10 June 2026.
- TikTok labels AIGC using a combination of Content Credentials, creator labeling tools and invisible watermarking technology.
- TikTok removed more than 86 million fake accounts in Q1 2026 alone, the company said in July.
- Creators who simply use AI tools as part of their creative process don’t need to add Instagram’s AI-generated profile label.
View the data
Synthetic health promoters: The New York Times reported in July that it found hundreds of AI-generated doctors, healers, and wellness personalities on social media promoting supplements or making health claims to users. Treat an unlabeled persona giving health or money advice as unverified until its identity and claims check out.
Disclosure is becoming a distribution rule on Instagram. Our AI regulation tracker follows the EU and national rules as they take effect.
Are virtual influencers here to stay?
Brand use of AI is rising, and disclosure is becoming the condition attached to it. 46% of brands already use AI in creator campaigns, while 76% of consumers trust virtual influencers for product recommendations. Instagram will also limit the reach of AI-generated profiles that do not add the label, so the personas most likely to last are the disclosed ones.
Conclusion
46% of brands use AI in creator campaigns, and influencer teams apply it to creator discovery at 36.67% and to fraud detection at 7.22%. That imbalance matters because audience fraud, not content, is where reported problems sit, and fewer consumers prefer AI-generated creator content even as marketers increase investment in it.
The next readings to watch are enforcement data from Instagram’s reach limits and the first compliance actions under the EU transparency rules. Brands that pair AI sourcing with audience verification and clear labels stand to gain most from virtual influencers, while those that skip disclosure carry the most risk.




















































