Anthropic’s annualized revenue run rate hit $65 billion at the end of July, a sevenfold increase from a year ago, according to an investor update confirmed by CNBC. Among the Claude AI statistics below, enterprise spending tells the clearest story: Menlo Ventures estimates that Anthropic now earns 40% of enterprise LLM spend, up from 24% last year and 12% in 2023, after unseating OpenAI as the enterprise leader.
The consumer picture is smaller but moving fast. Similarweb’s traffic panel shows Claude moved from barely 2% to close to 9% of generative AI website visits between June 2025 and May 2026, while Gemini rose from under 9% to around 27% to 28%. Over the same span, ChatGPT’s share of generative AI website visits fell from about 76% in June 2025 to roughly 53% by May 2026. The data below covers revenue, funding, market share, usage by country, benchmarks, and API pricing.
Key Takeaways
- OpenAI’s enterprise position reversed: OpenAI lost nearly half of its enterprise share, falling to 27% from 50% in 2023.
- Coding is Claude’s strongest market, where Anthropic commands an estimated 54% market share, compared to 21% for OpenAI.
- The United States accounts for the highest share (21.6%) of Claude.ai usage, with India at 7.2%.
- Developers pick the biggest model for agentic work: 54% of Claude Code sessions are served by Opus, against 10% of chat and Cowork conversations.
- Frontier pricing keeps falling, and Opus 5.5 input and output tokens are $4 and $20 per million, 20% less than Opus 5.
- Big-ticket accounts doubled fast: business customers each spending over $1 million on an annualized basis exceed 1,000, doubling in less than two months.
Editor’s Choice
- Run-rate revenue: $65 billion at the end of July 2026.
- Latest valuation: $965 billion post-money after $65 billion in Series H funding.
- Second-quarter revenue: A preliminary $11.5 billion for the second quarter, a 14-fold jump from a year ago.
- Business customers: Over 300,000 business customers as of the Series F announcement.
- Claude Code run rate: Over $2.5 billion, more than doubled since the beginning of 2026.
- Opus 5.5 running cost: 40% less to run than Opus 5.
- Coding share of Claude.ai use: 36% of the total sample in the September 2025 Economic Index.
Claude AI Statistics on Revenue and Run Rate Growth
- Sources: 41 sourced figures, with 27 from Anthropic itself (announcements, Economic Index reports, pricing documentation), 10 from Menlo Ventures and Similarweb research, and 4 from news reports tracing to Anthropic disclosures.
- Window: July 2025 to September 2026.
- Method: Run-rate revenue is an annualized snapshot, not audited annual revenue.
- Refresh: Reviewed on a rolling basis, with figures updated when sources publish new editions.
- It has been less than three years since Anthropic earned its first dollar in revenue, per the Series G announcement.
- Run-rate revenue was growing over 10x annually in each of those past three years at the time of the Series G.
- Revenue and usage increased 80-fold in the first quarter on an annualized basis, a rate CEO Dario Amodei described as “just crazy,” according to VentureBeat.
- Anthropic generated roughly $10 billion in revenue for all of 2025.
- The run rate added $18 billion between the May update and the end of July.
| Milestone | Run-rate revenue ($ billions) |
|---|---|
| January 2024 | 0.087 |
| December 2024 | 1 |
| August 2025 | over 5 |
| End of 2025 | approximately 9 |
| February 2026 | 14 |
| March 2026 | 19 |
| April 2026 | over 30 |
| May 2026 | over 47 |
| End of July 2026 | 65 |
Source: Anthropic, CNBC, VentureBeat, 2024 to 2026
Anthropic Funding Rounds and Valuation
- Anthropic has completed a Series F fundraising of $13 billion led by ICONIQ.
- Anthropic raised $30 billion in Series G funding led by GIC and Coatue.
- Series H funding was led by Altimeter Capital, Dragoneer, Greenoaks, and Sequoia Capital.
- Series H funding also includes $15 billion of previously committed investments from hyperscalers, including $5 billion from Amazon.
- Anthropic signed agreements with Amazon for up to five gigawatts of new capacity, and with Google and Broadcom for five gigawatts of next-generation TPU capacity.
- The post-money valuation rose about 2.5 times between the Series G and Series H rounds.
Recent Developments
- September 2026: Anthropic announced that Claude discovered a novel enzyme system with CRISPR-like repeats.
- September 2026: Claude Opus 5.5, the first model in the new Claude 5.5 family, launched, and Opus 5.5 also generates output more than 30% faster than Opus 5.
- September 2026: Anthropic partnered with Accenture on embedded evaluation of frontier models, and Anthropic and Accenture each expect to invest at least $1 billion in building capacity in this area over the next five years.
- September 2026: Anthropic’s threat report said that over the past eight months, the Threat Intelligence team identified and disrupted operations in which threat actors tried to use Claude for malicious activity.
- September 2026: Anthropic introduced Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1, its most advanced models for coding and knowledge work.
- August 2026: CNBC reported that Anthropic told investors its annualized revenue run rate climbed to $65 billion in July.
Claude Enterprise LLM Market Share
- Anthropic, OpenAI and Google together account for 88% of enterprise LLM API usage, with the remaining 12% spread across Meta’s Llama, Cohere, Mistral, and a long tail of smaller providers.
- Companies spent $37 billion on generative AI in 2025, up from $11.5 billion in 2024, a 3.2x year-over-year increase, according to Menlo Ventures.
- Menlo’s December estimate surveyed ~500 U.S. enterprise decision-makers and combined their insights with a bottoms-up model of the market.
- Enterprise LLM spend more than doubled in just six months, rising from $3.5 billion in November 2024 to $8.4 billion by mid-2025.
- The spend lead and the revenue lead point the same way, and our OpenAI vs Anthropic revenue comparison tracks the two companies side by side.
Claude Coding Market Share and Claude Code Growth
- Claude Code was made available to the general public in May 2025.
- Claude Code has quickly taken off, already generating over $500 million in run-rate revenue with usage growing more than 10x in just three months, according to the Series F announcement.
- The number of weekly active Claude Code users has also doubled since January 1, per the Series G post.
- A recent analysis estimated that 4% of all GitHub public commits worldwide were being authored by Claude Code, double the percentage from just one month prior.
- Business subscriptions to Claude Code have quadrupled since the start of 2026, and enterprise use has grown to represent over half of all Claude Code revenue.
- Vendor-by-vendor adoption of coding assistants sits in our AI coding statistics.
| Period | Anthropic coding share (%) | OpenAI coding share (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Mid-2025 | 42 | 21 |
| End of 2025 | 54 | 21 |
Source: Menlo Ventures, 2025
Key finding: Menlo Ventures estimates that Anthropic now commands an estimated 54% coding market share, up from 42% just six months ago, driven in large part by the popularity of Claude Code. Coding was the first enterprise AI workload with real budgets behind it, so leading there early fed the wider spend lead.
Claude Business Customers and Enterprise Adoption
- The number of customers spending over $100,000 annually on Claude has grown 7x in the past year, as of the Series G.
- Eight of the Fortune 10 are now Claude customers, per the Series G announcement.
- Businesses that start with Claude for a single use case (API, Claude Code, or Claude for Work) are expanding their integrations across their organizations.
- Claude is the first frontier model available on all three of the world’s largest cloud platforms: Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure.
| Business customer metric | Figure | Reported at |
|---|---|---|
| Customers spending over $1 million annualized | a dozen | Two years before the Series G |
| Customers spending over $1 million annualized | over 500 | Series G, February 2026 |
| Customers spending over $1 million annualized | over 1,000 | Google and Broadcom compute announcement |
| Total business customers | over 300,000 | Series F announcement |
Source: Anthropic, 2025 to 2026
Claude.ai Web Traffic and Generative AI Market Share
- Claude.ai visits held in a relatively narrow, slow-growing band through most of 2024 and 2025, then broke sharply upward starting in February 2026, roughly doubling in each of the following two months.
- ChatGPT’s share fell by more than 20 percentage points in twelve months, a slide our ChatGPT usage statistics track in detail.
- Gemini’s app has a monthly user base many multiples larger than Claude’s, both in the US and worldwide, but Claude’s stickiness rate is slightly higher than Gemini’s in both geographies.
| Platform | Share of gen AI web visits, June 2025 | Share of gen AI web visits, May 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | about 76% | roughly 53% |
| Gemini | under 9% | around 27 to 28% |
| Claude | barely 2% | close to 9% |
Source: Similarweb, 2026
How many users does Claude have?
Anthropic has not published a monthly active user count in the announcements reviewed here, so any single MAU number for Claude is a third-party estimate. The disclosed figures measure scale in other ways: Anthropic now serves over 300,000 business customers.
Claude Usage by Country
- The US, India, Japan, the UK, and South Korea lead in overall Claude.ai use, according to Anthropic’s January 2026 Economic Index.
- Countries with lower AI adoption per capita concentrate overwhelmingly on coding tasks, over half of all usage in India, compared to roughly a third globally.
- The top 20 countries account for 48% of all per-capita usage, up from 45%, per the March 2026 report.
- Inside the US, the share of usage accounted for by the 10 highest usage states decreased from 40% to 38%.
Why it matters: Anthropic’s Economic Index lists India at 7.2% of total Claude.ai usage, yet emerging economies, including Indonesia at 0.36x, India at 0.27x and Nigeria at 0.2x, use Claude less than their population would predict. Raw volume and per-capita depth tell different stories, so India’s usage share alone overstates how widely Claude has spread there.
What People Use Claude For
- The use of Claude for coding continues to dominate the total sample at 36%, while educational tasks surged from 9.3% to 12.4%, and scientific tasks from 6.3% to 7.2%.
- Directive conversations, where users delegate complete tasks to Claude, jumped from 27% to 39%.
- The share of chat and Cowork conversations categorized as personal use spikes from around 35% on weekdays to just under 50% on weekends.
- Work conversations most often produce documents and reports (20%), followed by explanations (9%), email drafts (7%), and analyses and summaries (6%).
- Anthropic’s classifier identified 93% of Claude conversations as producing an artifact.
- People who have been using Claude for 6 months or more have 10% fewer personal conversations and a 6% higher education level reflected in their inputs, plus a 10% higher success rate in their conversations.
- Computer and Mathematical occupations make up roughly 30% of survey respondents, far above their 4% share of US employment; the education gain tracks the classroom adoption covered in our AI in education statistics.
Claude Model Benchmarks
- Opus 5.5 performs at the level of Claude Fable 5.1 on most work, according to Anthropic.
- On knowledge work, GDPval-AA v2.1 scores were 1846 for Opus 5.5, 1735 for Fable 5.1 and 1708 for Opus 5.
- Rival models still lead some tests: on Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, GPT-6 Astra scored 64.6% against 58.7% for Opus 5.5.
- On AutomationBench business workflows, GPT-6 Astra scored 41.4%, Opus 5.5 40.0%, and Opus 5 26.9%.
- Benchmark leads reshuffle within a few release cycles, which the AI model tracker logs launch by launch.
Claude API Pricing by Model
- Cache reads (which make up the majority of agentic and coding work costs) are $0.20 per million tokens, 60% less than Opus 5, for Opus 5.5.
- Claude Haiku 3.5 lists at $0.80 per million input tokens and $4 per million output tokens.
- Claude Mythos 5.1 lists at $10 per million input tokens and $50 per million output tokens.
- Opus 4.1 output tokens cost 3.75 times the Opus 5.5 output rate.
The takeaway: Anthropic says Opus 5.5 requires less compute to serve than Opus 5, and at default settings it will cost 40% less than Opus 5 on typical workloads. For teams running agents at volume, tokens used per task now move the monthly bill as much as the list price does.
Claude vs ChatGPT and OpenAI
- OpenAI last raised a $122 billion round in March, the benchmark for Anthropic’s Series H.
- Anthropic’s run rate was about 1.6 times OpenAI’s at the time of the August update.
- Model-by-model results sit in our Claude vs ChatGPT statistics.
| Metric | Anthropic (Claude) | OpenAI (ChatGPT) |
|---|---|---|
| Annualized run-rate revenue | $65 billion | $40 billion |
| Latest post-money valuation | $965 billion | $852 billion |
| Enterprise LLM spend share, end of 2025 | 40% | 27% |
| Share of gen AI web visits, May 2026 | close to 9% | roughly 53% |
Source: CNBC, TechCrunch, Menlo Ventures, Similarweb, 2025 to 2026
Which has more users, Claude or ChatGPT?
ChatGPT has the larger audience. According to Similarweb, ChatGPT still receives more web visits worldwide than Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity combined. Claude’s advantage sits in enterprise budgets rather than audience size, which is how Anthropic can post the higher run rate while trailing on consumer traffic.
Is Claude making money?
Anthropic has not published audited profit figures in its announcements. Anthropic also shared a preliminary revenue figure of $11.5 billion for the second quarter, and The Wall Street Journal recently reported that the startup expects a 130% revenue surge to bring it to its first operating profit.
A reported expectation is not a filed result, so treat profitability as unconfirmed until a public prospectus appears.
Conclusion
Anthropic’s annualized revenue run rate hit $65 billion at the end of July, and Menlo Ventures estimates Anthropic now earns 40% of enterprise LLM spend. Read together, the figures show Claude winning where developers and enterprises set budgets, while ChatGPT keeps the larger consumer audience. Enterprise buyers, developers weighing API costs, and investors tracking the listing all have a stake in which of those advantages lasts.
The next reference point is a public prospectus, which would swap run-rate snapshots for audited revenue and could add the first official user counts.