Apple Moves Forward with Lawsuit Against Jon Prosser After Missed Deadline

Published on: October 22, 2025, 10:22 AM EDT

YouTuber Jon Prosser faces mounting legal pressure as Apple advances its lawsuit over leaked iOS 26 design details.

Quick Summary – TLDR:

Apple sued Jon Prosser and Michael Ramacciotti over the unauthorized leak of iOS 26’s “Liquid Glass” redesign.
Prosser missed the deadline to respond, prompting the court to enter a default against him on October 17.
Apple alleges misappropriation of trade secrets and violation of federal laws related to computer fraud.
Prosser denies ignoring the lawsuit, stating he’s been in active communication with Apple since the beginning.

What Happened?

Apple is moving ahead with a lawsuit against tech YouTuber Jon Prosser, after he failed to formally respond to allegations of leaking iOS 26 design details before its official reveal. While the court has entered a default against Prosser, he claims that behind the scenes, he has been communicating with Apple directly.

Leaker Jon Prosser says he’s been talking with #Apple all along, even as court records suggest he ignored the company and legal proceedings entirely. pic.twitter.com/sJEgWrx2ac
— AppleInsider (@appleinsider) October 22, 2025

Apple Alleges Trade Secret Theft Over iOS 26 Leak

The lawsuit dates back to July 2025, when Apple filed legal action against Jon Prosser and Michael Ramacciotti, accusing them of leaking the highly anticipated iOS 26 redesign, known internally as Liquid Glass.

Apple claims that Ramacciotti unlawfully accessed a development iPhone belonging to Ethan Lipnik, a former Apple employee. According to court documents:

Ramacciotti allegedly used location tracking to determine when Lipnik would be away.
He reportedly acquired Lipnik’s passcode and accessed his phone without permission.
During the unauthorized access, he is said to have made a video call to Prosser, showing the unreleased iOS 26 interface.

Apple further alleges that Prosser recorded this interaction using screen capture tools, stored the trade secret footage on his device, and shared it through his YouTube channel for commercial gain.

The company claims Prosser not only knew about the plan but proposed the scheme to Ramacciotti and offered to find a way for him to get paid.

Prosser Denies Claims, Responds to Missed Deadline

Despite the seriousness of the accusations, Jon Prosser missed the court’s deadline to formally respond. On October 10, Apple requested a default judgement against him, which was granted by the court on October 17.

However, Prosser disputes any suggestion that he’s been ignoring the case. In a statement to The Verge, he said:

“
All I can tell you is that regardless of what is being reported, and regardless of what the court documents say – I have, in fact, been in active communications with Apple since the beginning stages of this case. The notion that I’m ignoring the case is incorrect. That’s all I am able to say.
Jon ProsserYouTuber

While informal discussions may be happening, legal experts point out that communications outside the courtroom have no bearing on legal timelines. A court default typically occurs when a defendant fails to respond within the required timeframe, regardless of any private talks.

Prosser’s History of Apple Leaks

Jon Prosser has been a prominent Apple leakster, often sharing insider details on unreleased products such as iPhones, AirPods, and now iOS versions. His iOS 19 mockup, which accurately previewed the iOS 26 redesign, stirred both admiration and legal scrutiny.

His video revealed the Liquid Glass UI, which closely resembled the final design seen at WWDC 2025.
Apple claims that these mockups were not speculative but based on actual stolen trade secrets.

While Apple has often tolerated leaks or responded quietly, this lawsuit marks a rare moment of public legal action against an online figure.

SQ Magazine’s Takeaway

I’ve followed Jon Prosser’s leaks for years, and while his accuracy often impressed, this one clearly crossed a line for Apple. The tech giant doesn’t take kindly to internal secrets being exposed in such a detailed fashion. Even if Prosser believed he was just reporting, the way the information was allegedly obtained is what’s fueling this legal fire. This case isn’t just about a YouTuber leaking features. It’s about whether someone played a role in accessing and sharing stolen company property. If proven true, it sets a serious precedent for how Apple handles future leaks and those who broadcast them.