SQ Magazine publishes research-led statistics content built on verifiable data, transparent sourcing, and consistent editorial standards. This methodology explains how we identify, evaluate, validate, and present statistics across our coverage, including market analysis, technology adoption trends, cybersecurity reporting, and software and platform insights.
Our objective is to ensure that every statistic we publish is traceable to a credible source, interpreted responsibly, and presented in a format that supports accurate understanding and informed decision-making.
Key Principles
- Statistics are sourced from reputable, transparent, and verifiable providers.
- Original research, surveys, or expert interviews may be conducted when reliable public data is limited or unavailable.
- Each statistic is validated for accuracy and consistency before publication.
- Figures are standardised to improve clarity, comparability, and interpretation.
- All statistics content is reviewed by the SQ Magazine editorial and research team.
- Corrections are made when supported by credible evidence and verified sources.
1) Topic Selection and Scope Definition
All statistics content begins with a clearly defined research objective.
- Research question definition: Each article is designed to answer one or more specific analytical questions.
- Audience context: We identify whether the intended audience is consumer, business, technical, or market-focused.
- Scope boundaries: We define geographic coverage, industry versus company-level focus, and historical versus forward-looking timeframes.
- Terminology and definitions: Key terms such as active users, incidents, market size, revenue, spend, and adoption are defined upfront to ensure consistency.
This process reduces ambiguity and ensures statistics are applied within a clear analytical framework.
2) Source Selection Standards
We prioritise sources that meet high standards for credibility, transparency, and reproducibility.
- Authoritative primary sources: Government agencies, regulators, official datasets, and statutory reports.
- Recognised research providers: Established research organisations, market intelligence firms, and standards bodies.
- Academic and institutional research: Peer-reviewed studies and institutional publications with disclosed methodology.
- Company disclosures: Audited reports and official filings where directly relevant.
- Survey-based research: Surveys that publish sampling methods, fieldwork dates, population definitions, and limitations.
- Excluded or restricted sources: Unattributed statistics, circular citations, secondary reposting without original data access, and marketing claims lacking methodology.
When commonly cited figures fail to meet these standards, they are excluded or clearly qualified.
3) Primary Research and Expert Interviews
In specific cases, SQ Magazine research team conducts original research to supplement public data.
- Original market research: Surveys or structured data collection may be conducted when reliable public datasets are limited, outdated, or unavailable.
- Expert interviews: On select occasions, we interview industry leaders, executives, researchers, and subject-matter experts to obtain direct insight and expert commentary.
- Use of interview insights: Interview input is clearly identified as qualitative insight or expert opinion and is not presented as standalone statistical measurement unless supported by data.
Primary research and interviews complement, but do not replace, our data verification standards.
4) Data Collection and Verification Controls
We apply structured controls to reduce the risk of inaccurate or misleading statistics.
- Cross-referencing: Key figures are validated against additional reputable sources where feasible.
- Definition alignment: Comparable statistics are checked to ensure consistent terms, populations, and measurement windows.
- Recency validation: Preference is given to the most recent datasets, with publication dates stated clearly.
- Conflict handling: When sources conflict, discrepancies are explained in narrative form rather than forcing false precision.
Statistics that cannot be verified to a reasonable standard are excluded or clearly labelled with limitations.
5) Normalisation and Derived Metrics
Statistics are standardised to improve clarity and comparability.
- Unit and currency normalisation: Figures are converted into consistent units, including thousands, millions, billions, and currencies where disclosed by sources.
- Timeframe alignment: Reporting periods such as calendar year, fiscal year, or rolling periods are clearly identified.
- Observed versus projected data: We clarify whether data is observed, estimated, or forecast.
- Derived calculations: Metrics such as growth rates, compound annual growth rate, ratios, rankings, penetration, and market share are calculated only when source data supports them.
- Rounding and precision: Rounding is applied consistently to support readability without implying false accuracy.
Forecasts are presented as projections with explicit attribution and are not framed as guaranteed outcomes.
6) Editorial Structure and Presentation Standards
Statistics are presented with clarity, context, and usability as primary requirements.
- One statistic per bullet: Each statistic is presented as a single, discrete bullet point containing one clear data point.
- Contextual explanation: Every statistic includes concise context explaining what the number represents.
- Logical grouping: Related statistics are grouped under descriptive subheadings such as adoption, demographics, regional distribution, costs, incidents, or sector exposure.
- Supporting formats: Tables, charts, and visual elements may be used to support bullet points where appropriate.
This structure ensures each statistic functions as an independent, searchable unit aligned with reader intent.
7) Fact-Checking and Editorial Review
All statistics content undergoes editorial review prior to publication.
- Numerical accuracy checks: Figures are verified against cited sources.
- Definition and timeframe validation: Editors confirm that denominators, baselines, and reporting periods are consistent.
- Logical consistency review: Totals, percentages, comparisons, and derived figures are checked for coherence.
- Interpretation limits: Editorial review ensures conclusions do not exceed what the data supports.
Oversight is managed by the SQ Magazine editorial and research team.
8) Updates, Maintenance, and Content Refresh
Statistics content is reviewed periodically to reflect new information.
- Scheduled data releases: Updates may follow annual, quarterly, or recurring dataset publications.
- Market or regulatory changes: Material changes in market structure or regulation may trigger revisions.
- Methodology improvements: Content may be updated when improved data or methodology becomes available.
Where content reflects a specific data window, the timeframe is clearly stated.
9) Corrections, Independence, and Responsible Use
- Corrections and feedback: We accepts correction requests supported by credible evidence, including article URL, affected statistic, and supporting source. Full details are outlined in our Actionable Feedback Policy and Corrections Policy pages.
- Editorial independence: Affiliate or commercial relationships do not influence data selection, methodology, or editorial judgment.
- Responsible use disclaimer: Statistics are provided for informational purposes and should not be interpreted as professional financial, legal, or technical advice without appropriate consultation.
Our Commitment to Quality
This methodology defines how we produce statistics content that is accurate, transparent, and responsibly presented. By applying consistent research standards, rigorous verification, and editorial oversight, we ensure that every statistic published can be trusted, understood, and used with confidence.
These principles guide all statistics-driven coverage on SQ Magazine, from market analysis and technology trends to cybersecurity and platform insights. Each article is structured to deliver clear, verifiable data points supported by credible sourcing and contextual explanation.
Our commitment is to publish statistics that inform decision-making, support meaningful analysis, and maintain high editorial integrity across all content.
