---
title: "Red Hat Confirms GitLab Breach Targeted Consulting Division Only"
date: 2025-10-03
author: "Sofia Ramirez"
featured_image: "https://sqmagazine.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/red-hat-confirms-gitlab-breach.jpg"
categories:
  - name: "Cybersecurity"
    url: "/cybersecurity.md"
tags:
  - name: "News"
    url: "/tag/news.md"
---

# Red Hat Confirms GitLab Breach Targeted Consulting Division Only

Red Hat has confirmed a security breach affecting one of its GitLab instances, exposing data tied to its consulting division after a cybercrime group claimed responsibility for the intrusion.

## Quick Summary – TLDR:

- Red Hat confirmed a breach of a GitLab instance used solely by its consulting team
- Cybercriminal group Crimson Collective claims to have stolen 28,000 internal repositories
- Exposed files may include sensitive data like network details, credentials, and customer engagement reports
- Red Hat states the attack does not affect its products, GitHub, or broader software supply chain

## What Happened?

Red Hat, a leading provider of open-source enterprise solutions and an IBM subsidiary, has acknowledged a breach in one of its internal GitLab instances. The breach, [confirmed](https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/security-update-incident-related-red-hat-consulting-gitlab-instance) by Red Hat, involves a server used exclusively for consulting projects and not related to [GitHub](https://sqmagazine.co.uk/github-statistics/) or Red Hat’s core product infrastructure. A [cybercrime](https://sqmagazine.co.uk/cybercrime-statistics/) group calling itself **Crimson Collective** claims to be behind the attack.

> Security update: Incident related to Red Hat Consulting GitLab instance <https://t.co/EzKzoaEktM>
> 
> — Red Hat (@RedHat) [October 2, 2025](https://twitter.com/RedHat/status/1973834145009635761?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)

 ## Breach Involved 28,000 Internal Repositories

The breach, first reported by members of the cybersecurity press, stems from an unauthorized access incident in Red Hat’s self-managed GitLab Community Edition instance used internally by its Consulting division. According to **Crimson Collective**, they extracted **approximately 570GB of compressed data** containing over **28,000 private repositories**, many of which held **Customer Engagement Reports (CERs)**.

These CERs often include:

- **Project infrastructure details**.
- **Configuration data**.
- **Authentication tokens and database URIs**.
- **Internal code snippets and communications**.

Red Hat confirmed that such reports were part of the compromised content but stated that these typically do **not contain sensitive personal information**. So far, no personal data has been identified in the ongoing investigation.

## Claims and Fallout

Crimson Collective publicly listed affected entities on Telegram, showcasing a broad spectrum of clients allegedly exposed in the incident. The list includes high-profile names such as:

- Bank of America
- Walmart
- T-Mobile
- Mayo Clinic
- The U.S. Navy
- Federal Aviation Administration
- The House of Representatives

The hackers allege that by analyzing exposed CERs and code, they obtained credentials and tokens that could lead to **downstream compromise of customer networks**. They attempted to contact Red Hat for an extortion deal, but received only a templated reply directing them to submit a vulnerability report. The hackers claim the ticket was passed among Red Hat’s legal and security teams without a direct response.

## Red Hat’s Response and Remediation

In its official statement and security update, Red Hat stated:

“

Upon detection, we promptly launched a thorough investigation, removed the unauthorized party’s access, isolated the instance, and contacted the appropriate authorities.

Red Hat Official Statement





Red Hat emphasized that:

- The GitLab instance was **not connected to any Red Hat product or GitHub presence**.
- **The company’s software supply chain remains secure**.
- **No indication of broader Red Hat product compromise has been found**.

As a precaution, **additional hardening measures** have been implemented and **affected customers are being contacted directly**. Red Hat also noted that the instance is used only for certain consulting engagements, limiting the scope of exposure.

Meanwhile, the **Centre for Cybersecurity Belgium (CCB)** issued a warning, stating that the breach poses **a high risk to organizations using Red Hat Consulting**. They flagged the potential for stolen credentials and configuration data to be used in follow-on attacks.

## SQ Magazine’s Takeaway

I think this incident serves as a critical reminder that **even internal collaboration tools need robust security practices**. While it’s reassuring that Red Hat quickly isolated the [data breach](https://sqmagazine.co.uk/data-breach-statistics/) and protected its core systems, the fact that customer engagement data was stolen is concerning. **Trust is everything in enterprise software**, and even if personal data wasn’t exposed, the idea that infrastructure blueprints or tokens might be out there should put everyone on alert. I hope Red Hat brings more transparency as they learn more.