---
title: "Apple Moves Forward with Lawsuit Against Jon Prosser After Missed Deadline"
date: 2025-10-22
author: "Robert A. Lee"
featured_image: "https://sqmagazine.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/apple-moves-ahead-with-lawsuit-against-youtuber-for-leaking-ios-26-preview.jpg"
categories:
  - name: "Internet"
    url: "/internet.md"
tags:
  - name: "News"
    url: "/tag/news.md"
---

# Apple Moves Forward with Lawsuit Against Jon Prosser After Missed Deadline

YouTuber Jon Prosser faces mounting legal pressure as Apple advances its lawsuit over leaked iOS 26 design details.

## Quick Summary – TLDR:

- Apple sued Jon Prosser and Michael Ramacciotti over the unauthorized leak of iOS 26’s “Liquid Glass” redesign.
- Prosser missed the deadline to respond, prompting the court to enter a default against him on October 17.
- Apple alleges misappropriation of trade secrets and violation of federal laws related to computer fraud.
- Prosser denies ignoring the lawsuit, stating he’s been in active communication with Apple since the beginning.

## What Happened?

Apple is moving ahead with a lawsuit against tech YouTuber Jon Prosser, after he failed to formally respond to allegations of leaking iOS 26 design details before its official reveal. While the court has entered a default against Prosser, he claims that behind the scenes, he has been communicating with Apple directly.

> Leaker Jon Prosser says he’s been talking with [\#Apple](https://twitter.com/hashtag/Apple?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw) all along, even as court records suggest he ignored the company and legal proceedings entirely. [pic.twitter.com/sJEgWrx2ac](https://t.co/sJEgWrx2ac)
> 
> — AppleInsider (@appleinsider) [October 22, 2025](https://twitter.com/appleinsider/status/1980894991812845654?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)

 ## Apple Alleges Trade Secret Theft Over iOS 26 Leak

The lawsuit dates back to **July 2025**, when Apple filed legal action against **Jon Prosser** and **Michael Ramacciotti**, accusing them of leaking the highly anticipated **iOS 26 redesign**, known internally as **Liquid Glass**.

Apple claims that **Ramacciotti** unlawfully accessed a **development [iPhone](https://sqmagazine.co.uk/iphone-statistics/)** belonging to **Ethan Lipnik**, a former Apple employee. According to court documents:

- Ramacciotti allegedly **used location tracking** to determine when Lipnik would be away.
- He reportedly **acquired Lipnik’s passcode** and accessed his phone without permission.
- During the unauthorized access, he is said to have made a **video call to Prosser**, showing the unreleased iOS 26 interface.

Apple further alleges that Prosser recorded this interaction using **screen capture tools**, stored the trade secret footage on his device, and shared it through his YouTube channel for commercial gain.

The company claims Prosser not only knew about the plan but **proposed the scheme** to Ramacciotti and offered to find a way for him to get paid.

## Prosser Denies Claims, Responds to Missed Deadline

Despite the seriousness of the accusations, **Jon Prosser** missed the court’s deadline to formally respond. On **October 10**, Apple requested a **default judgement** against him, which was **granted by the court on October 17**.

However, Prosser disputes any suggestion that he’s been ignoring the case. In a statement to [The Verge](https://www.theverge.com/news/803754/apple-jon-prosser-trade-secrets-lawsuit-responds-default), he said:

> “
> 
> All I can tell you is that regardless of what is being reported, and regardless of what the court documents say – I have, in fact, been in active communications with Apple since the beginning stages of this case. The notion that I’m ignoring the case is incorrect. That’s all I am able to say.
> 
> Jon ProsserYouTuber

While informal discussions may be happening, **legal experts point out** that communications outside the courtroom have no bearing on legal timelines. A court default typically occurs when a defendant fails to respond within the required timeframe, regardless of any private talks.

## Prosser’s History of Apple Leaks

Jon Prosser has been a **prominent Apple leakster**, often sharing insider details on unreleased products such as iPhones, AirPods, and now iOS versions. His **iOS 19 mockup**, which accurately previewed the iOS 26 redesign, stirred both admiration and legal scrutiny.

- His video revealed the **Liquid Glass UI**, which closely resembled the final design seen at **WWDC 2025**.
- Apple claims that these mockups were not speculative but based on actual stolen trade secrets.

While Apple has often tolerated leaks or responded quietly, this lawsuit marks a rare moment of **public legal action** against an online figure.

## SQ Magazine’s Takeaway

I’ve followed Jon Prosser’s leaks for years, and while his accuracy often impressed, this one clearly crossed a line for Apple. The tech giant doesn’t take kindly to internal secrets being exposed in such a detailed fashion. Even if Prosser believed he was just reporting, the way the information was allegedly obtained is what’s fueling this legal fire. This case isn’t just about a [YouTuber](https://sqmagazine.co.uk/youtube-statistics/) leaking features. It’s about whether someone played a role in accessing and sharing stolen company property. If proven true, it sets a serious precedent for how Apple handles future leaks and those who broadcast them.